W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > July 2010

Re: ISSUE-36 (Default vocab specification): Should Profile documents allow the specification of a default vocabulary? [RDFa 1.1 Core]

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:14 +0100
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1279290434.22738.10.camel@ophelia2.g5n.co.uk>
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 10:17 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
> Good point - so that's an argument for @vocab overriding any default
> vocabulary specified in the @profile document. 

@vocab overriding @profile is consistent with @prefix overriding it
(which is what currently happens).

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 14:28:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:07 GMT