W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > July 2010

Re: XHTML Basic + RDFa

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:34:59 +0200
Cc: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <83FBB8C0-A3DD-42DD-B8A0-0CC4C4F59F19@w3.org>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>

On Jul 14, 2010, at 15:26 , Shane McCarron wrote:

> It would take about 10 minutes. I can do it today. 

:-) Before you loose too much time, let me check with the mobile folks whether that is what is needed. Although that DTD might be useful anyway...

Ivan

> 
> "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> This issue came up within the team. At present, the mobile web best practice checker relies on XHTML Basic, using the DTD. That means that all XHTML+RDFa files will be declared as invalid.
>> 
>> How much work would it mean to generate an XHTML Basic + RDFa DTD? I would not expect to have any influence on the processing, so it is really just having a DTD at hand...
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf







Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 13:35:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:07 GMT