W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Feedback on RDFa Core 1.1

From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:13:35 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimQHu1kbdLKCePahMtNzUvG2HMNfBKMftiU4iRF@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
I'm not sure these comments have been addressed yet in the latest Editor's
Draft [1]. I've attached a patch against Overview-src.html [2] if that
helps.

Steph.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2010/ED-rdfa-core-20100705/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/Overview-src.html

On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet
<scorlosquet@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This is feedback on the RDFa 1.1 core W3C Working Draft 22 April 2010
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-core-20100422/
>
> [[[
> biblio:         http://example.org/biblio/0.1
> ]]]
> any reason for not using an existing biblio ontology such a bibo:
> @prefix bibo: <http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/> .
> and further bibo:Book which is an existing class?
>
> [[[
>    '<span about="urn:ISBN:0091808189" typeof="biblio:book"
> ]]]
> how about using some common practice and capitalize RDF classes, e.g.
> biblio:Book?
>
> [[[
>  prefix="biblio: http://example.org/
> ]]]
> why not being consistent and reuse the same namespace defined earlier?
>
> [[[
> The general syntax of a CURIE can be summarised as follows:
> ]]]
> s/summarised/summarized (or do W3C documents use British spelling?)
>
> [[[
> For example, the full URI for Albert Einstein on DPPedia is:
> ]]]
> s/DPPedia/DBPedia
>
> [[[
> <#bbq> cal:dtastart "2015-09-16T16:00:00-05:00"^^xsd:dateTime .
> ]]]
> s/cal:dtastart/cal:dtstart
>
> [[[
>  <span property="foaf:givenname">Albert</span>
> foaf:givenName
> same for _:a foaf:givenname "Albert" .
> ]]]
> s/foaf:givenname/foaf:givenName
>
> [[[
> _:a foaf:name "Alber Einstein" .
> ]]]
> s/Alber Einstein/Albert Einstein (2 occurrences)
>
> [[[
> taxo:   http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/
> ]]]
> This prefix is not used anywhere in the document.
>
> I hope to have more comments in the future as I digest more of the
> draft, but this is it for today...
>
> Steph.
>



Received on Saturday, 10 July 2010 20:15:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:07 GMT