W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > July 2010

Re: ISSUE-26: RDFa-specific vs. Earl-like Processor Status vocabulary

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 17:06:21 +0100
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100707170621.7f7c1e49@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:35:27 -0400
Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> -1 to the EARL-based mechanism.
> +1 to the simpler, RDFa-specific vocabulary.

-1 to both.

No other RDF serialisation does anything like this.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 16:07:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:07 GMT