Re: RDFa API FPWD published

Some more remarks below.

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-api/#automatic-summaries
foaf:interests should be foaf:interest

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-api/#l
"Objects that are defined by the RDFA DOM API are designed"
The a in RDFA should be lower case since it's not a link to a bib reference..

There is a snippet containing some encoding related characters:
  <span property="startDate" content="20091015T1900Z">Oct 15,
7:00PM</span>—


Steph.

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote:

> On 06/08/2010 05:18 PM, Toby Inkster wrote:
> > Just seen this from @w3c on identi.ca.
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-api-20100608/
> >
> > Great news, but quick comment:
> >
> > We have a normative reference on N3 - this is wrong; it should be
> > N-Triples. This was discussed on our call a few weeks ago:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2010-04-29#line0039
>
> Fixed.
>
> "The stringification of RDFTriple results in an N-Triples-based
> representation as defined in [RDF-TESTCASES]."
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-dom-api/Overview-src.html#rdf-triples
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Myth Busting Web Stacks - PHP is Faster Than You Think
> http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/06/12/myth-busting-php/2/
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 14:45:40 UTC