W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Updating RDFa Core

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:04:28 -0500
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <dbe7cd86-6611-4f0e-ba56-20eb5987457c@email.android.com>
You are right about why it works. As to catalog...  we can add it anytime we want. Since it is pretty preliminary I would wait a while. 

And... duh. I wouldn't have pushed something that didn't validate! 

"Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

>On 07/05/2010 03:39 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
>> There is an editor's draft at
>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2010/ED-rdfa-core-20100705
>So, I passed this through the W3C validator and it passed!
>I wasn't expecting that to work... does it use the DTD that is specified
>at the top of the document? Is that why it worked?
>It also says that the DTD isn't a part of W3C's catalog - I guess it
>would only become part of W3C's catalog when the HTML5+RDFa spec goes to
>In any case, seeing an HTML4.01 + RDFa 1.1 document validate is pretty
>cool. Great job, Shane!
>-- manu
>Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
>President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>blog: Myth Busting Web Stacks - PHP is Faster Than You Think

Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Received on Monday, 5 July 2010 22:05:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:48 UTC