Re: Reverted HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft (2010-02-18)

(I remove the html wg from the list, because this is really an RDFa WG
question)

Manu,

what are the plans for an HTML5+RDFa Last Call? It would be a bit
disagreeable to have that LC go out while the RDFa WG is still working
on RDFa1.1 and not yet ready for a LC. I wonder what the synchronization
plans are in this respect.

Another approach is to explicitly flag that document you have now as
RDFa1.0 LC and acknowledge that there will be a separate document for
1.1. The question will be, however, how that document would be published...

The ideal would be, of course, that the RDFa+HMLT5 document would go to
LC at the same time as RDFa1.1's LC but, well, I am not sure that is
realistic...

Ivan

On 2010-2-18 06:33 , Manu Sporny wrote:
>>> 1. Revert the SotD section to what was there over a month ago.
> 
> Done.
> 
>>> 2. Remove all bugs reported in the status sections of the HTML+RDFa spec.
> 
> Done.
> 
>>> 3. Modify the wording of one of the bugs and insert ISSUE-41 as a blocking item
>>> for HTML+RDFa LC.
> 
> Done.
> 
> New draft is here:
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/
> 
> Diffs are here:
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/diffs/rdfa-diff-20091015-20100115.html
> 
> -- manu
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF   : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
vCard  : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf