- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:49:30 +0200
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, martin@weborganics.co.uk, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli, Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:46:10 +0200: > W.r.t. @alt, then I don't only compare it with @content but also with > <element>content</element>. The <element>content</element> of an > element is more than some material that is waiting to be defined via > RDFa. Thus, I cannot see that you have provided a sound justification > for why it is illogical to treat @alt as @content. More precisely, if it is not use to use the <element>content</element> then the author should use @content instead. And the same goes for @alt: if it is not meaningful to use it, then use @content instead. The author decides, case by case. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 13:50:05 UTC