- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 03:52:15 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Toby Inkster <mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Having looked at the source code of that spec, I guess that was my model as well. If @cite was to be interpreted as a subject, then - if there were many quotes from the same source one the same page, in different blockquote or q elements, then they would all belong to the same subject. And that would perhaps not be the typical intent. So I think I'm back on the track, for now ... If one mean to have more direct quoting/embedding, then one can use <iframe/> or <object/> (once @data is supported ...) ... Leif Shane McCarron, Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:11:04 -0500: > In the RDFa Core spec we use bibo:affirmedBy to associate a subject > in the document with an object elsewhere. My mental model for cite > was like that. > > "Leif Halvard Silli" > >> Toby Inkster, Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:49:58 +0100: >>> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:50:41 +0200 >>> Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >>> >>>> <blockquote id="q1" about="#q1" rel="cite" >>>> resource="urn:ISBN:0140449132"/> >>> >>> This question on semanticoverflow seems relevant: >>> >>> >> http://www.semanticoverflow.com/questions/1198/how-to-express-a-book-quote-into-rdfahtml-use-cases >> >> And one of the answers on that page: >> >> <blockquote about="urn:isbn:978-0-521-51385-2" >> cite="urn:isbn:978-0-521-51385-2"> >> >> Here one could claim that you draw a parallel between @cite and @about >> - it is a subject. My thinking has been that if RDFa gets native >> support for @cite, then it should treated like @href and @resource. >> >> However, perhaps it is you who are on the right track here: @cite can >> be seen as a semi-embedding of the quoted source. In that way it can >> been seen as similar to @src - the @src defines a subject. >> >> Comment? >> -- >> leif halvard silli > > -- > Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 01:52:48 UTC