RE: RDF WG ends

On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 5:42 PM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
> Looking at the errata [1] I see  only a few editorial comments being
> submitted:
> - Turtle has one error in an example, but I suggest to leave that as it
> is, as it requires a AC vote to change.
> - Primer has three proposed editorial fixes, all small. However,
> republishing a Note we can decide ourselves, and it would be good to
> leave as few as possible loose ends.

There's exists also very minor error in the JSON-LD spec:
   http://www.w3.org/2014/json-ld-errata

This errors are very minor and in non-normative sections of the documents
(examples), so it's really a shame that the W3C process doesn't allow to fix
these in place?


> PROPOSED: Republish a new version of the Primer as WG Note, with errata
> fixes (see [2] for the ED with the fixes).

+1


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2014 21:11:43 UTC