W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Turtle ResPec version

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 08:55:27 -0500
To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, Sandro <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20140104135525.GA21549@w3.org>
* Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> [2014-01-04 11:43+0100]
> 
> 
> On 03-01-14 23:26, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> >* Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> [2014-01-03 18:28+0100]
> >>...
> >>2. Broken fragments for tests
> >>
> >>These links are not valid anymore in the new test setup. Remove?
> >
> >Hmm, tricky to deal with the legacy of my mistake from years ago. The
> >CR doc linked to them and inappropriately referred to them as
> >tests. Because they weren't the official test suite, they served only
> >as examples. The directory is there in perpetuity and probably the
> >most honest thing to do is call them examples in the text à la:
> >
> >s/(test: <a href="tests/#base1">base1</a> <a href="tests/#base2">base2</a>)
> >  /(example: <a href="tests/#base1">base1</a> <a href="tests/#base2">base2</a>)
> >  /
> >
> >and change the http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/tests/ document to say:
> >[[
> ><h1>Turtle Examples</h1>
> >
> >The following pairs of Turtle and N-Triples documents serve as
> >auxiliary examples to the Turtle specification. (Despite the directory
> >name, these are not official Turtle tests.)
> >
> ><h2>Example Coverage</h2>
> >
> >The following table associates example labels with the features those
> >examples are supposed to cover.
> >]]
> >
> >Shall I?
> 
> This looks like a reasonable solution, assuming it is OK to touch
> this document in TR space.

Any future pulication would overwrite the directory for
/TR/turtle/tests so the act of publishing grants us that
permission. Updating them will obviate Gavin's action 281: "Provide
sandro text for http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/tests/ to NOT say it's the
test suite"
  <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/281>

I'm just trying to figure out the mechanics. Usually when I publish, I
copy all the appropriate files around. We don't have a tests directory
in the Mercurial repo so I can either revert the earlier deletion (or
however one does that in Mercurial), or, reply to this thread with a
copy of the new tests/Overview.html and drop it into place when we're
ready to publish. My preference is the latter as it involves less
negotiation with mercurial.

-- 
-eric

> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/tests/#prefix1
> >>(line 1499)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/tests/#escapedNamespace1
> >>(line 1501)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/tests/#base1
> >>(line 1497)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/tests/#type
> >>(line 1506)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/tests/#default1
> >>(line 1501)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/tests/#base2
> >>(line 1497)
> >>
> >>
> >>3. Broken fragments for grammar productions:
> >>
> >>Error in the BNF generation?
> >
> >Following are patches I made to CR that didn't get rolled back into
> >respec when Gavin and I attempted the grand reconciliation:
> >
> >STRING_LITERAL{,_LONG}{1,2} were ref'd in the old changes section
> >which referenced the SPARQL grammar productions. I updated the respec
> >edition to point to SPARQL directly.
> >
> >#rfc398{6,7} were old-style bib references.
> >#iri-a now points to "The token 'a' in the predicate position..."
> >#relative-iris is now #relative-iri
> >#turtleIRIs is now #prefixed-name
> >#rHEX was how SPARQL referenced IRIs. Fixed to use #grammar-production-HEX
> 
> Great, thanks!
> Guus
> 
> >
> >
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/Overview.html#grammar-production-STRING_LITERAL_LONG2
> >>(line 1812)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/Overview.html#grammar-production-STRING_LITERAL_LONG1
> >>(line 1812)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/Overview.html#rfc3987
> >>(line 959)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/Overview.html#grammar-production-STRING_LITERAL2
> >>(line 1812)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/Overview.html#IRIs
> >>(line 418)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/Overview.html#relative-iris
> >>(line 414)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/Overview.html#grammar-production-IRIref
> >>(line 1101)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/Overview.html#rfc3986
> >>(line 957)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/Overview.html#turtleIRIs
> >>(line 415)
> >>
> >>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/PR-drafts/PR-turtle-20140109/Overview.html#rHEX
> >>(lines 995, 1002, 1011)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On 23-12-13 09:01, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> >>>* Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name> [2013-12-22 17:11-0800]
> >>>>Yes
> >>>>
> >>>>On Sunday, December 22, 2013, Guus Schreiber wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On 22-12-13 19:54, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>* Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> [2013-12-22 18:27+0000]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>On 22/12/13 17:40, Guus Schreiber wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  Let me know when the other docs are done (content final, no
> >>>>>>>>ResPec/HTML/link errors):
> >>>>>>>>- Concepts
> >>>>>>>>- Turtle
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>This doc was in a state of flux due to the non hg version floating
> >>>>>>>around so I haven't touched it to avoid risk losing anything.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Gavin said during the transition call that he'd copy the contents of
> >>>>>>the SOTD and re-validate.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Is the difference between the jay version and the hg version only the
> >>>>>SOTD? In that case I can just take over.
> >>>
> >>>If the writing stick is being surrendered, I may as well take over as
> >>>there were a few things that I did to make it (mostly) validate.
> >>>
> >>>   s{ class=""}{}g
> >>>   s{ data-grammar-original="[^"]+"}{}g
> >>>   s{ data-grammar-expression="[^"]+"}{}g
> >>>   s{content="Eric Prud" hommeaux'=""}{content="Eric Prud'hommeaux"}g
> >>>
> >>>I say "mostly" because there are three remaining RDFa-related errors:
> >>>
> >>>   1 Error Line 2, Column 49: there is no attribute "lang"
> >>>     …s="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" dir="ltr" typeof="bibo:Document w3p…
> >>>
> >>>   2 Error Line 2, Column 176: there is no attribute "prefix"
> >>>     …="en" version="XHTML+RDFa 1.0" prefix="bibo: http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/ w3…
> >>>
> >>>   3 Line 240, Column 64: there is no attribute "inlist"
> >>>     …-card vcard" rel="bibo:editor" inlist=""><span typeof="foaf:Person"><a class="
> >>>
> >>>I presume these are a product of RDFa version skew between Respec and the DTD.
> >>>
> >>>After ack from Guus, I'll presume writing the stick and transplant the
> >>>SOTD. I can then generate the snapshot, performing the necessary edits
> >>>on the way.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>Guus
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  - TriG
> >>>>>>>>- N-Triples
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Done for ReSpec and HTML5.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>The linkchecker is returning "502 Proxy Error" after a timeout for
> >>>>>>>me just at the moment.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I'll try again later.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>         Andy
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Guus
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >

-- 
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Saturday, 4 January 2014 13:56:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:18 UTC