- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:21:18 +0100
- To: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Antoine Zimmermann'" <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:06 PM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: > > I did this and corrected the typos Markus spotted. Great, I saw you also fixed the nesting of sections. If you want, you can restrict the ToC to 2 levels by adding maxTocLevel: 2 to Respec's configuration. It will then look as follows: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-dataset/index.html?maxTocLev el=2 I only have one more comment (apart the one for which I didn't get a response yet): In the introduction you've included a snippet from the charter. As currently formatted, it looks like something went wrong when rendering the document. I would propose to either delete those two lines (preferred) or to not format "Required features" as header but simply make it bold or something. The comment I didn't get a response yet was: We discussed minting a IRI for each of these options. Unfortunately, I can't remember what we decided but I still think that would be a good idea. It's an informative document, everyone can mint IRIs and as such I see no risk or downside of doing so but just benefits. If we don't live what we preach, why should others? Have a nice weekend, Markus -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Friday, 21 February 2014 21:21:55 UTC