W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2014

Re: SPARQL Query reference

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:24:20 +0100
Message-ID: <530350F4.9090306@vu.nl>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Andy, Peter,

Thanks for your responses. Docs have been updated.

Guus

On 18-02-14 11:45, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> For Turtle and TriG:
>
> The reference is used in the context of thr grammar and alignment is to
> SPARQL 1.1 so it should be the SPARQL 1.1 version.  Direct href links
> are to this version.
>
>
> trig/index.html
> rdf-turtle/index.html
>
> Each doc there is one change:
>
> The [] reference changes and the link text changed to the current title
> "SPARQL 1.1 Query Language".
>
> I haven't touched the REC drafts - I can do if you want me to.
>
> The REC drafts have autogenerated HTML for the references.
>
> Should the docs be regenenerated (how?) or change the HTML in place?
>
>      Andy
>
> On 18/02/14 01:18, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> In some sense, the pointer to the old version is right,  as that is
>> where datasets came from.  However, there is no problem with pointing to
>> the new version, and it is probably better to do so.
>>
>> peter
>>
>> On 02/17/2014 02:20 PM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>>> Peter, Pat, Eric, Gavin, Andy,
>>>
>>> Semantics, Turtle and TriG all have a reference to the SPARQL Query
>>> document of 2008:
>>>
>>>   [RDF-SPARQL-QUERY]
>>>     Eric Prud'hommeaux; Andy Seaborne. SPARQL Query Language for RDF.
>>> 15 January
>>>     2008. W3C Recommendation. URL:
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this be updated to refer to the 2013 version
>>> [[sparql11-query]]?
>>>
>>> Guus
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2014 12:24:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:19 UTC