W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2014

RE: Comments on 17 December 2013 WD of RDF 1.1 Primer

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 20:06:31 +0100
To: "'Guus Schreiber'" <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, "'Thomas Baker'" <tom@tombaker.org>
Cc: "'RDF Working Group'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, "'Public RDF comments list'" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <02b601cf2113$0fd8dec0$2f8a9c40$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Monday, February 03, 2014 4:35 PM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
> ======================================================================
> > Comments of substance
> >
> > --  "The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a framework for
> >      describing information about resources..."
> >
> >      This definition uses the same three words as what it defines --
> >      Resource,  Description, and Framework.  How about:
> >
> >          The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a language for
> >          expressing information about things.
> 
> See also responses to Bob and Antoine. Changed as suggested except for
> "language". Admittedly, "framework" is a bit vague, but language would
> create the wrong expression (with so many concrete syntaxes floating
> around).

What about "data model" instead of "framework" or "language"?


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 3 February 2014 19:07:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:19 UTC