W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2013

TriG - review comments

From: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8fff5ca3-3728-4276-8d7d-2c7fb98443b2@default>
To: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Document looks good. I have some minor editorial comments below (based on last night's version).

Editorial:

Sec 1.
- Please use hyphen or comma between "Trig" and "a concrete syntax ..."
  "This document defines TriG a concrete syntax for RDF as defined in the RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax ([rdf11-concepts])."

Sec 2.
- Please replace "A IRI" with "An IRI"
  "A IRI or blank node label used as a graph label may also reoccur as part of any triple statement."

Sec 2.1.
- Please replace "an RDF" with "a RDF"

Sec 2.2.
- Please replace "more then" with "more than"
  "In a TriG document a graph IRI or blank node may be used to label more then one graph."

- Please consider using: "may be used as label for more than one graph statements"
  "In a TriG document a graph IRI or blank node may be used to label more then one graph."

Sec 2.3.1
- As an example, we could refer to use of _:b in Example 2 and in Example 3 in Sec 2.2.
  "BlankNodes sharing the same label in differently labeled graph statements are considered to be the same BlankNode."

General comment: 
Could we say something like: "a graph statement has two parts: a label and an RDF graph. The label of a graph statement can be an IRI or a blank node. ..."
This may make refering to the label easier.

I quickly browsed the grammar -- seemed fine to me.

Thanks,
- Souri.
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2013 14:18:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:16 UTC