W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2013

proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38

From: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:03:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMpDgVzGH4OBA9Di_1Wq1iGLG9TqbFAPttYMLcoZfh5fy0Jbug@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Here is my proposed response to
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Jul/0022.html

Comments?

peter



Dear Jeremy:

Even if it may be common to have RDF datasets that include owl:Ontology and
owl:imports, RDF itself has nothing to say about their use or meaning, nor
should it.  Therefore, the RDF WG will not make any change to its documents
in response to this particular comment.

If you feel that this is not a satisfactory resolution, please let us know.
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 17:03:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 September 2013 17:03:53 UTC