W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Publishing RDF/JSON as

From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:11:37 -0700
To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFADAF7E67.3F0B338D-ON88257BDB.006E8560-88257BDB.006EED90@us.ibm.com>
Sounds good. Thanks.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group


Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> wrote on 09/03/2013 05:09:07 AM:

> From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
> To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 
> Cc: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Date: 09/03/2013 05:09 AM
> Subject: Re: Publishing RDF/JSON as
> 
> Arnaud,
> 
> I suggest we publish the note when JSON-LD becmes CR, i.e. next week. No 

> need for action from your side; I'll update the JSON-LD ref.
> 
> Guus
> 
> On 29-08-13 22:12, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> > Hi Arnaud,
> >
> > the reference to JSON-LD is wrong(ish).. It should be
> >
> > Manu Sporny, Gregg Kellogg, Markus Lanthaler. JSON-LD 1.0. 11 April 
2013.
> > W3C Last Call Working Draft (work in progress). URL:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/
> >
> >
> > Will this note be updated when all the referenced documents are RECs? 
If
> > not, I think it would make sense to hold back publishing till then.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Markus Lanthaler
> > @markuslanthaler
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------ Original Message ------------
> > From: Arnaud Le Hors [mailto:lehors@us.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:02 PM
> > To: Guus Schreiber
> > Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: Publishing RDF/JSON as
> >
> > Hi Guus,
> >
> > I've updated the draft and it is ready to be published:
> >
> > The latest editor's draft is here:
> > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-json/index.html
> >
> > And I have a draft ready for publication, passing pubrules here:
> > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-json/Overview.html
> >
> > The only thing that the webmaster will need to do is change the date 
to
> > match the actual publication date when that happens.
> >
> > However, I think we need to have a formal resolution about publishing 
it as
> > a WG Note. The last decision we took was about pursuing publication.
> >
> > Let me know if there is anything else you need me to do.
> > Regards.
> > --
> > Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
> >
> 
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 20:12:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:16 UTC