W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Turtle PR Draft - editorial items

From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:14:32 +0000
Message-ID: <5289F698.3040608@apache.org>
To: RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
CC: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
The escaping problems are more widespread and lead to a formal comment.

I've gone and fixed the 4 documents as described in:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Nov/0051.html


NB - this included removing ' from the \ list in NT and NQ

	Andy

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/CR_Comments#CR_comments

has been updated.

(Our comments process is heavy weight - for things where there is an 
associated issue, then I have had to do the process twice.)



On 15/11/13 11:40, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> * Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> [2013-11-15 10:53+0000]
>> 1/ The date is wrong!!
>>
>> "W3C Proposed Recommendation 19 February 2013"
>>
>> 2013 -> 2014
>>
>> 2/ The correction to IRIREF has got lost again.
>>
>> Old
>> [18] 	IRIREF 	::= 	'<' ([^#x00-#x20<>\"{}|^`\] | UCHAR)* '>'
>>
>> Correct
>> [18] 	IRIREF 	::= 	'<' ([^#x00-#x20<>"{}|^`\] | UCHAR)* '>'
>>
>> The incorrect one has \ twice.  The first is a mistake trying to
>> escape the " but it is not needed.  turtle.bnf is right but does not
>> have the /**/ comment and is out-of-step with turtle-bnf.html
>
> Yep, we've left turtle.bnf behind. All changes should go directly to
> the markedup document, as you have done (tx).
>
>
>> Other occurrences of \ look right including rule ECHAR where is a literal \
>>
>>
>> I have made these corrections in hg to rdf-turtle/index.html (for 1)
>> and rdf-turtle/turtle-bnf.html (for 2)
>
> thanks kindly.
>
>
>> 	Andy
>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 11:15:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:17 UTC