Re: implementation reports

On 11/01/2013 02:28 PM, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org 
> <mailto:sandro@w3.org>> wrote:
>
>     On 11/01/2013 01:09 PM, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>     Is there any problem with me sending out a personal heads-up to
>>     various groupa a bit in advance so that the process can start a
>>     bit early, or at least we can get an idea of who might participate?
>>
>
>     Please don't point them to that /TR URL, but if you point them to
>     the editor's draft, it's fine.
>
>
> OK.
>
>
>     Looking more, I see respec has a field implementationReportURI.
>
>     Also, I wonder about including your what's-changed text in either
>     the SOTD, or on a wiki page we link to from the SOTD.   I'm
>     inclined to go with the wiki version so we can update it.      In
>     either case, I guess use respec's 'sotd' field to add it.
>
>
> Wiki is better, I think, as there may be missing bits, and we might 
> like to update it independently of any official document.

Okay, I linked to http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Entailment_Changes

Please update it by Tuesday.

Also, please make sure I didn't mess up anything with 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-rdf11-mt-20131105/

       --- Sandro

>
>             - s
>
>
> peter
>