Re: implementation reports

On 11/01/2013 12:25 PM, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> What should be said in any outgoing message?
>

I've actually already copied it over to TR space.   I can copy it again 
if you need to make changes, but for just the SOTD, might as well let me 
handle it.    I added a paragraph in the middle, there...

http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-rdf11-mt-20131105/

        -- Sandro


> peter
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net 
> <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>> wrote:
>
>     On Nov 1, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org
>     <mailto:sandro@w3.org>> wrote:
>
>>     On 10/31/2013 01:25 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>>>     On Oct 31, 2013, at 9:26 AM, Peter Patel-Schneider<pfpschneider@gmail.com>  <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>     Are all the implementation reporting setups supposed to be like Turtle (with EARL data, etc., etc., etc., etc.,)?  If so, the WG is going to need someone to take care of the process for the Semantics tests.
>>>     As with the other test suites, Ivan handle this.  BTW, reports are t limited to turtle, any RDF syntax will do.
>
>     Wow, who knew auto-correct could do something like this? Perhaps
>     it's looking at my address book. Sorry, Ivan!
>
>>     I'm assuming Gregg meant:
>>
>>         As with the other test suites, I will handle this.  BTW, reports are not limited to turtle, any RDF syntax will do.
>>
>     Yes, indeed, I'll take care of whatever is necessary. Not too much
>     work for me, probably much more confusing for someone else.
>
>     Gregg
>
>>         In which case, I'll say thank you again!
>>
>>
>>            -- Sandro
>>
>>>     Gregg
>>>>     peter
>>>>
>>
>