W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2013

Re: Agenda 22 May telecon

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 16:35:41 +0200
Message-ID: <519CD7BD.7020409@vu.nl>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Added to the agenda.
Guus

On 22-05-13 11:01, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 21/05/13 23:16, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>> See:
>>
>>    http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.05.22
>>
>> Guus
>>
>>
>
> Where are we on language tags?
>
> The discussion last week was squeezed down by blank nodes as named graph
> labels.
>
> Please can we schedule discussions on blank nodes as named graph labels
> (*if* ISSUE-131 is opened) at the end of calls.
>
>
> ** Proposal on language tags:
>
> 1/ RDF processors are not REQUIRED to recognize any datatype IRIs
>
> (removes text that adds "other than rdf:langString and xsd:string")
>
> 2/ rdf:langString
>
> Add as a proper subsection of section 5 of concepts.
>
> [[
> The value space associated with this datatype IRI is the set of all
> pairs of strings and language tags.
> ]]
> -->
> [[
> The value space of rdf:langString is the set of pairs (string, LC-lang)
> where LC-lang is a lowercase language tag.
> ]]
>
> This aligns with rdf:PlainLiteral.
>
> Semantics defines the special abstract syntax to value space mapping for
> rdf:langString.
>
> 3/ xs:string
>
> concepts adds a proper subsection for xs:string to note that the value
> space of xs:string excludes codepoint U+0000 and surrogate blocks, and
> it is implementation-defined whether it aligns to XML 1.0 or XML 1.1
>
> (see Peter's comments re "Notes on xsd:string and binary data")
>
>      Andy
>
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 14:36:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 22 May 2013 14:36:07 UTC