- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:44:02 +0100
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 15/05/13 22:25, David Wood wrote: > On May 15, 2013, at 13:58, Andy Seaborne > <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > >> >> On 15/05/13 18:20, Sandro Hawke wrote: >>> Is there someone (I hope it can be you) who can join a call >>> (maybe a side-call) to talk this through? >> >> The resolution for blank nodes as graph names was not on placed on >> the meeting agenda [*] for today's telecon. >> >> I think it is highly inappropriate to proceed out-of-band. > > > This was my error. I was traveling and put the topic on the agenda > without explicitly putting the proposal there. There was a proposal > at the top of the email thread, which was linked from the agenda. David, You mean this email? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013May/0120.html I don't understand that as a proposal. It ends "thoughts?"; it has text acknowledging that there is a decision to reverse. The message goes on to propose graph literals and full N3 syntax. I took it to be an explicit request for comments and maybe (at most) an implicit request to reopen the matter. Andy > > It may be moot in any case. > > Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood > > >> >> Andy >> >> [*] >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/index.php?title=Meetings:Telecon2013.05.15&oldid=3374 >> >
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 10:44:37 UTC