- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 12:47:49 -0500
- To: "public-rdf-wg@w3.org WG" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
(I think we may have decided this already, but can't find the decision.) If some RDF has a language-tagged literal with a bad language tag (not conforming to section 2.2.9 of BPC 47), is that 1. an RDF syntax error 2. syntactically legal but inconsistent (because the literal has no legal value) 3. legal and consistent (because even a bad language tag is still an RDF language tag) ? Pat PS. If we have to decide this, I vote for 3 as being less work to implement, and on the grounds that RDF's job isn't to check on bad data. ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 17:48:15 UTC