- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:27:21 +0000
- To: RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
None of these comments affect publishing as FPWD. All comments refer to N-Triples - add "Ditto N-Quads." Andy 1/ Turtle/N-Triples: There is a small difference between Turtle and N-Triples. N-Triples requires white space where Turtle does not between S/P and P/O N-Triples: [2] triple ::= WS* subject WS+ predicate WS+ object WS* '.' WS* For alignment, I suggest WS+ ==> WS* especially as the before-dot is already WS* (We've talked about canonical N-Triples with exactly one space; this is about the grammar). The text in the intro says this "*may* be separated by white space" (my emphasis) already. (typo - it says "seperated" in the doc.) 2/ (editorial) Section 2.4: This section is taken from Turtle - for N-triples, the explanation of relation to PN_CHARS_BASE is odd. 3/ (editorial) Section 2.3: [[ Literals may not contain the characters ", ... ]] confusing - the literal (the abstraction) can contain those characters. And for ", the characters of the language contains " albeit written as \". 4/ Serializers [[ Issue N-Triple seralizers are not defined here, will likely include optional behavior to conform to RDF Test Cases syntax as well. ]] The specifics for the RDF Test Cases should go in the test cases documentation because a serializer should only need conform with the grammar. Talking about canonical N-Triples could go here. 5/ (editorial) N-Quads / N-Triples The languages are "N-Triples" and "N-Quads" (with "s"). """ N-Triple documents N-Triple parsers """ ==> """ N-Triples documents N-Triples parsers """ ditto N-Quads 6/ URIs http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/N-Triple ==> http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/N-Triples (the first is 404, the second 200) Ditto for http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/N-Quad
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 11:28:03 UTC