- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:14:14 +0200
- To: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:46 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Yeah, the situation with respect to numbers is now probably as good as
> it can be, modulo reception from the JSON community.
>
> The JSON-LD API needs to distinguish "fractional part" from RFD 4627
> JSON numbers "fraction part" and frac production. The suggestion on the
> call today, something like "fractional part (i.e., the remainder modulo 1)",
> I believe, would work fine, I think.
I've already updated the spec, diff(s):
https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/70db9f9e3593b6cc5957be7534bca655577de53c
https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/157954cf8b12618effc675f3a89dbf3681089361
--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
> peter
>
>
>
> On 07/10/2013 08:04 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:51 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> >> On 07/10/2013 06:49 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> >>> This was already proposed by Pierre-Antoine some time ago but
> didn't
> >> have enough support to result in a spec change. I could live with
> that
> >> but wouldn't be too happy about it because it would mean that a
> JSON-LD
> >> document like
> >>> {
> >>> "@id
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 16:14:49 UTC