Re: RDF Concepts: Add definition for literals that are not language-tagged strings

On Jul 4, 2013, at 5:43 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:

> RDF Concepts currently only defines the subset of literals that are
> language-tagged strings. There's no name for literals that are not
> language-tagged strings. In JSON-LD we use "typed value" for that class of
> literals. I would like to propose to add such a definition to RDF Concepts. 

I suggest we call them "literals that are not language-tagged strings".

Pat

> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:32:45 UTC