- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:32:15 -0500
- To: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Quick comment on one point: On Jul 1, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > Hi all, > > I had a look at the latest version of RDF Concepts and have a couple of > comments and suggestions: > > ... > Can we (re)move sections 1.7 Equivalence, Entailment and Inconsistency and > 3.6 Graph Isomorphism, and 4.1 RDF Dataset Isomorphism (to Semantics)? > I would like to keep graph *isomorphism* and dataset *isomorphism* in Concepts. They are not semantic ideas, but part of the abstract syntax specification; and it is good to keep them clearly distinct from the semantic idea of (logical) equivalence. Pat ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 23:32:44 UTC