W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Using bnode identifiers for predicates, graph names

From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:37:38 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPqY83z00iFcCgfah60s2_syQn5bOwZ2o1_Rf6n9y+jfEV56zQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote:

> I realize that this may open a can of worms, but we need a fairly
> definitive answer from the RDF WG on JSON-LD and using bnode identifiers
> for predicates and graph names.
>

I don't think the definitive answer has changed since before the working
group started. In fact you'll find in the Charter blank nodes
as predicates being explicitly out of scope. The issue of blank nodes as
graph names has also been resolved. See all the publications of the RDF 1.1
Concepts documents, or just the most recent one
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130115/#section-dataset
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 17:38:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:53 GMT