W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: RDF Extension request and JSON-LD API

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:28:52 -0500
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9C52B624-F008-40DC-9676-64630213C755@3roundstones.com>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Hi Gregg,

OK, so noted.

Please be aware that the abbreviations used in the extension request are not the same as the W3 short names.  They are merely a convenience used to make the tables readable.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood



On Jan 23, 2013, at 16:25, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:

> Dave, in your draft extension request [1] you list rdf-jsonapi as Note track, when in fact, it's REC track, along with rdf-jsonsyn. BTW, these are your short-names, and not those actually assigned. We've been using json-ld-syntax and json-ld-api, but I believe there's a request to change the API document to JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API, with a short name of json-ld-processing.
> 
> At this point, we think we'll complete editing work on the Syntax document in January, but won't finish the Processing document until the middle of February.
> 
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Rdf-extension.html




Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 21:29:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:53 GMT