W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: RDF-ISSUE-119 (Test-Suite): Spec should reference the test suite [RDF Turtle]

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:23:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CANfjZH1EOx-rJ3fcBevqrq961MixsTOsS8cfrNEoz5xSDWApdA@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDF Working Group <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Feb 22, 2013 12:11 PM, "RDF Working Group Issue Tracker" <
sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
> RDF-ISSUE-119 (Test-Suite): Spec should reference the test suite [RDF
Turtle]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/119
>
> Raised by: Gregg Kellogg
> On product: RDF Turtle
>
> As requested in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Feb/0038.html,
the spec should reference the test suite. There is a ReSpec property that
will do this in the head:
>
>
>      testSuiteURI:         "http://...",
>
> This could be set to an HTML page which references the two manifests, or
alternatively, to the rollup EARL report, which itemizes the test
manifests, and can serve as a test manifest itself.
>
> The two test manifests that should be referenced and used with EARL
reports are the following:
>
>
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl/manifest.ttl
>
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/coverage/tests/manifest.ttl

I had to manually tweak a lot of markup to minimize diffs (html diff tool
characteristically unhelpful) and fix a few bugs in the grammar section.
I'm tempted to switch to editing HTLM for the last few editions.
Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 18:23:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:54 GMT