W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

RE: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:26:01 +0100
To: "'Andy Seaborne'" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <021b01ce0f6d$d4db8050$7e9280f0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:59 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> On 20/02/13 12:29, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> > What if that fragment is already in use? Relabeling blank nodes is
> trivial
> > as they are transient by definition. You*cannot*  do the same with
> fragment
> > IDs without changing the data.
> 
> What happens if the bnode identifier is in use already?  This is only
> document scope.

You can easily rename each bnode identifier. Even the ones that are already
there. You can't do the same with IRI (fragments).



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 13:26:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:54 GMT