W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names

From: Souripriya Das <SOURIPRIYA.DAS@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:48:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <0a4f5b19-b804-43b0-aedc-2da7983ec144@default>
To: <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Andy,

You said: "which becomes something in RDF.  We discussing what."

What would be (the currently most popular) proposed RDF translation for that JSON-LD array of graphs in your example?

Thanks,
- Souri.

----- Original Message -----
From: andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com
To: wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 6:21:45 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names



On 20/02/13 10:21, William Waites wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:15:37 +0000, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> said:
>
>      > I proposed the *parser* generate fragments or URIs and in fact
>      > label generation is what happens in your example ... _:c14n1,
>      > _:c14n2 which came from somewhere.  They are generated.  Use
>      > <#g1>, <#g2>.
>
> Are you seriously proposing that a parser for a serialisation format
> for what is meant to represent RDF ought to mint URIs?
>
> That doesn't seem like an especially sound strategy to me. JSON-LD
> should not be so special that it is radically different from the other
> serialisations and goes so far as to actually *change* the underlying
> RDF data...

It's not changing the underlying RDF data.

The input is JSON-LD syntax; the output is RDF quads.

The input is a JSON array of graphs:

[{
   "@graph": {
     "source": "http://mybank.com/accounts/manu",
     "destination": "http://yourbank.com/accounts/richard",
     "amount": "5.00",
     "currency": "USD"
   }
},{
   "@graph": {
     "source": "http://mybank.com/accounts/manu",
     "destination": "http://yourbank.com/accounts/kingsley",
     "amount": "5.00",
     "currency": "USD"
   }
}]

which becomes something in RDF.  We discussing what.

RDF/XML does it with rdf:li :-)

	Andy

>
> -w
>
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 11:49:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:54 GMT