W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Additions to Agenda tomorrow

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:04:29 -0500
Message-ID: <5123CCBD.9060702@digitalbazaar.com>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
This is a request to add the following items to the RDF WG telecon
Agenda tomorrow:

1. Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Allow a graph name to
   be both (IRI, graph), and (blank node, graph).
2. Preference-poll: Do blank node identifiers, when used as graph names,
   denote graphs?
3. Preference-poll: Do IRIs, when used as graph names, denote graphs?

Here are the corresponding proposals:

PROPOSAL: Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Specifically,
allow associating (IRI, graph) and (blank node, graph) when naming graphs.

PREFERENCE POLL: Blank nodes, when used as graph names, denote the graph
that they are paired with.

PREFERENCE POLL: IRIs, when used as graph names, denote the graph that
they are paired with.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals
http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 19:04:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:54 GMT