- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:04:29 -0500
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
This is a request to add the following items to the RDF WG telecon Agenda tomorrow: 1. Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Allow a graph name to be both (IRI, graph), and (blank node, graph). 2. Preference-poll: Do blank node identifiers, when used as graph names, denote graphs? 3. Preference-poll: Do IRIs, when used as graph names, denote graphs? Here are the corresponding proposals: PROPOSAL: Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Specifically, allow associating (IRI, graph) and (blank node, graph) when naming graphs. PREFERENCE POLL: Blank nodes, when used as graph names, denote the graph that they are paired with. PREFERENCE POLL: IRIs, when used as graph names, denote the graph that they are paired with. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 19:04:58 UTC