W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:36:32 -0500
Message-ID: <511E7220.8030102@digitalbazaar.com>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
CC: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 02/15/2013 11:59 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> Hmm, I am now feeling like we should re-think our decision here. 
> David, Guus, are you following this? Do I hear a groaning noise yet?

Yay! Thank you Eric for explaining this in a way that resonated with
Pat. Yes, this is exactly what we'd like to do (and was the reason
JSON-LD supported blank-node-like IDs as graph labels - we couldn't see
any technical reason why it couldn't work and it made sense to us to do so).

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals
http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
Received on Friday, 15 February 2013 17:37:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:54 GMT