W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Using bnode identifiers for predicates, graph names

From: William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:11:45 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <20130206.101145.514422315.wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
To: andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:09:02 +0000, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> said:

    andy> An identifer for a graph-not-labeled by the data publisher
    andy> can still be an IRI.

To reiterate, this is true of all things that are not
named/labelled. So why bother having blank nodes at all?  What makes
graphs so special that we can't talk about them without giving them
IRI-labels?

-w



Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 10:12:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:54 GMT