- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:27:04 -0600
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
>>> >>> Could we introduce the concept of a 'blank graph identifier'? >> >> Sure - (1) create your own URI scheme or (2) a systematic way to >> generate UUIDs based on doc and position of the graph in the doc > > If we do #1 or #2, we're basically going to re-invent blank node > identifiers. No, if you do #1, you will be using IRIs, which is in conformance with (the letter of the) specs. So why not just do that? Its not hard to do: just use a short alphanumeric string instead of "_" before the colon. Why are you making so much fuss about it? Pat > We are then going to standardize the re-invention of blank > node identifiers by pushing the RDF Dataset Normalization document to > REC through W3C. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals > http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 22:27:31 UTC