- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:28:20 +0100
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
All, In the interest of time I'm taking one of the proposals and suggest it as candidate resolution for tomorrow's telecon. Please note: we're not the first to struggle with this issue (to say the least); it's a problem that is dumped on us. . My suggestion is to take one of Richard's last proposals [1, see option 2]: PROPOSED: withdraw the resolution of last week, and (again) normatively define the datatypes, but make *only* the value space and L2V space informative. Suggested wording; this should work both for rdf:HTML and for rdf:XMLLiteral: [[ The lexical space is implementation-dependent. The lexical-to-value mapping is Implementation-dependent. [..] NOTE Implementations may use the following approach for the lexical space and lexical-to-value mapping of this datatype. This approach depends on [DOM4], a specification that has not yet reached W3C Recommendation status, and is therefore not normatively required. [details on lexical space and L2V mapping go here] END NOTE ]] Guus [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Dec/0260.html
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2013 23:28:47 UTC