- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:23:13 -0800
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:32 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > Another question.. currently Concepts normatively references Semantics which > means we have a circular dependency. Seems to me that this kind of circularity is entirely appropriate. If you call it a hand-shake it sounds better. Pat > Is this what we want or shall we > convert the reference to be informative? > > Even though it could be argued either way, I think I would prefer to make it > informative. Thoughts (or has this already been discussed)? > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile (preferred) phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 17:23:49 UTC