Normative reference from Concepts to Semantics from Markus Lanthaler on 2013-12-16 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from December 2013)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:32:01 +0100
To: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01bb01cefa7c$5ae63c90$10b2b5b0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>

Another question.. currently Concepts normatively references Semantics which
means we have a circular dependency. Is this what we want or shall we
convert the reference to be informative?

Even though it could be argued either way, I think I would prefer to make it
informative. Thoughts (or has this already been discussed)?


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 16:32:33 UTC