- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:59:37 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
I would like to have RDF 1.1 at the beginning, like the other documents, I'd like that "RDF Datasets" stays like this, and we can put something like "Discussion" in it, to show it's not only providing just one solution. "RDF 1.1: A Discussion of the Semantics of RDF Datasets" AZ. Le 13/12/2013 13:34, Markus Lanthaler a écrit : > On Friday, December 13, 2013 12:05 PM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: >> Le 13/12/2013 11:29, Guus Schreiber a écrit : >>> The ED is, in my opnion, in a state that merits publication as first >>> public working draft. I PROPOSE that, unless someone objects within >> the >>> next two days, we publish on Tuesday (last chance before the >> publication >>> moratorium). No reply will be interpreted as consent. Remember: for >> FPWD >>> you don't have to agree with everything in there. If you have a >> comment >>> you might want to ask Antoine to put in an ISSUE note. >> >> +1 > > +1 > >>> Antoine: pls change the shortname to "rdf11-datasets". >> >> And maybe the title to "RDF 1.1 Datasets Semantics" (although "RDF >> Dataset" is the concept to which the semantics is applied). > > Could we add "Discussion" or "Potential" or something similar to indicate > that this document doesn't define the one and only dataset semantics but > discusses multiple options. So, something like "Discussion of RDF 1.1 > Dataset Semantics". > > > Cheers, > Markus > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 16:00:07 UTC