- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:36:40 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 13/12/13 12:34, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > On Friday, December 13, 2013 12:05 PM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: >> Le 13/12/2013 11:29, Guus Schreiber a écrit : >>> The ED is, in my opnion, in a state that merits publication as first >>> public working draft. I PROPOSE that, unless someone objects within >> the >>> next two days, we publish on Tuesday (last chance before the >> publication >>> moratorium). No reply will be interpreted as consent. Remember: for >> FPWD >>> you don't have to agree with everything in there. If you have a >> comment >>> you might want to ask Antoine to put in an ISSUE note. >> >> +1 > > +1 +1 > >>> Antoine: pls change the shortname to "rdf11-datasets". >> >> And maybe the title to "RDF 1.1 Datasets Semantics" (although "RDF >> Dataset" is the concept to which the semantics is applied). > > Could we add "Discussion" or "Potential" or something similar to indicate > that this document doesn't define the one and only dataset semantics but > discusses multiple options. So, something like "Discussion of RDF 1.1 > Dataset Semantics". > > > Cheers, > Markus > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > >
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 12:37:13 UTC