- From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:21:00 +0000
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- CC: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
[snip] > > > attached. > > It should be noted that the @context would usually be provided as an > IRI, or even hidden in the HTTP headers, leaving only the "nice" JSON > to be seen. > > > We could go further (but maybe this is too far for an annex of the > primer?), explaining that the server may even provide no @context at > all (as most web API currently do), but the @context could be built-in > knowledge of the client, allowing legacy JSON data to be "seen" as > RDF. It's now in mercurial - and an additional one with a remote context, which makes the JSON pretty nice to look at. One quick question - any reason for mapping uri to @id instead of just reusing @id? Best, Yves > > > best > > pa > > ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 17:29:02 UTC