W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2013

RE: RDF-ISSUE-140 (dataset-comparison): RDF Dataset Comparison (Ivan Herman) [RDF Concepts]

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 22:59:57 +0200
To: "'RDF Working Group'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007301ce947a$3ded0eb0$b9c72c10$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 6:47 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> We need to do *something*, as the above definition is now wrong. For
> example, it says that these are isomorphic:
> 
> { {_:x rdf:type ex:graphsIlike .}
> _:x {ex:a ex:b ex:c} }
> 
> { {_:y rdf:type ex:graphsIlike .}
> _:x {ex:a ex:b ex:c} }
> 
> which is incorrect.

Pat, according to you, are these two datasets

{
  {
    _:x rdf:type ex:graphsIlike .
  }
  _:x {
    ex:a ex:b ex:c}
  }
}

########

{
  {
    _:x rdf:type ex:graphsIlike .
  }
  _:x {
    ex:a ex:b ex:c}
  }
}

isomorphic? (yes, they are exactly the "same").



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2013 21:00:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 8 August 2013 21:00:32 UTC