On 9/26/12 10:14 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On 09/26/2012 09:42 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 9/25/12 10:48 PM, Gavin Carothers wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: >>>>> PROPOSED: Our dataset syntax will allow for the expression of >>>>> empty named graphs, whatever their semantics might be (to be >>>>> decided). The syntax is an empty curly-braces expression, as in >>>>> "<g> { }". >>>> +1. However, note that there is only one empty graph: it is unique. >>> Yes! There is only one empty graph. +1 Pat, now my brain hurts less. >>> >>> >>> >> +1 >> > > It seems to me that when people say "named graph" they are often (very > nearly always) referring to a g-box not a g-snap. Yes. > When I use the term "named graph", I am intentionally being ambiguous. > So, in fact there are lots distinct empty "named graphs", since they > are empty g-snap containers. Should have qualified my +1 as being about the "it is unique." part of the sentence i.e., lots of unique empty graphs <g> {}, <h> {}, <i> {} ... :-) > > -- Sandro > > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:51 GMT