W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus

From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:48:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPqY83yMm12tVoc8e5YGgTEuLMxrvoa+m0oqZr5wNe1edHcJgw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, W3C RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote:
>> PROPOSED: Our dataset syntax will allow for the expression of empty named graphs, whatever their semantics might be (to be decided). The syntax is an empty curly-braces expression, as in "<g> { }".
>
> +1. However, note that there is only one empty graph: it is unique.

Yes! There is only one empty graph. +1 Pat, now my brain hurts less.
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 02:49:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:51 GMT