W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: life without dataset semantics

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:32:52 -0400
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "public-rdf-wg@w3.org Group WG" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <09405BD9-DE31-469E-91A2-232919AF7A6E@3roundstones.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:06, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 10:02 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> On 09/19/2012 09:48 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>> I'm not convinced that there is any need to restrict properties like sendCorrectionsTo to datasets.
>>> 
>> 
>> How else could you define/document it?     In writing the property documentation, I find myself needing some way to talk about those intended triples (the ones containing the information that the corrections are about).  Without a dataset or some global relation underlying dataset semantics, I don't know how to do that.
>> 
>>    -- Sandro
> 
> You could just say that it is a relation between the name/location of a graph and something else.  in a dataset it would be the named graph in that dataset (or not).  Elsewhere it would refer to the graph at a location.

Sandro, are you looking for a URI that you can use as the rdfs:range for the property sendCorrectionsTo?

Regards,
Dave


> 
> peter
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2012 14:33:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:51 GMT