W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:02:05 +0100
Cc: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <015CC46F-5625-43CD-B50A-8E42FAA42EF0@garlik.com>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
On 2012-09-06, at 22:13, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> And, actually, parsing the same g-text twice creates two separate sets of fresh blank nodes. This is all very weird, but it's the only way how I can make sense of what actually happens as the specs are written and implemented. Parsing a g-text to a g-snap is not idempotent… ಠ_ಠ

That's true for other reasons too, as in:

<> a <Graph> .

I, personally, regard that as a feature.

- Steve

Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
+44 7854 417 874  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
80 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JL
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 10:02:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:07 UTC