W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: TriG and default graphs

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:20:51 +0100
Message-ID: <508958D3.7070000@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org


On 25/10/12 15:25, Steve Harris wrote:
> In principle I'm +1 on this, but we don't use default/anonymous graphs either, so I'd like to hear from people who do. Would this would be an OK solution?
>

what are you suggesting?

- TriG not to have a default graph
or
- making the examples of metadata not use the default graph.

	Andy

> It would certainly simplify the spec text, and it would make the parallel with NQuads more obvious.
>
> I have no feel for how many TriG files there out in the wild with anonymous graph contents.
>
> - Steve
>
> On 24 Oct 2012, at 17:29, Yves Raimond wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Just jumping on the last point that was mentioned in today's telecon, about possibly not providing any statements about what to do with a TriG default graph. I have the feeling that not doing that actually defeats the point of having a default graph at all.
>>
>> If we can't get to an agreement on that first point, I'd really like to understand what the rationale is behind supporting default graphs in TriG, apart from backward-compatibility. When used at the BBC, default graphs have proven to be a very confusing feature, and not having any statement on what do with them would only add to the confusion.
>>
>> All the dataset metadata that is supposed to go in that default graph could perfectly go in another named graph, e.g. identified by the URI of the sd:Dataset in the SPARQL end-point you're generating a TriG dump from, or the URI of the TriG file itself. Personally, I'd favour a 'flat' version of TriG, where everything is a named graph.
>>
>> Best,
>> Yves
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk
>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
>> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
>> If you have received it in
>> error, please delete it from your system.
>> Do not use, copy or disclose the
>> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
>> immediately.
>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
>> sent or received.
>> Further communication will signify your consent to
>> this.
>> -----------------------------
>
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 15:21:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT