W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2012

JSO-LD and RDF [was Re: Potential Formal Object from DERI over JSON-LD]

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:02:36 +0200
Message-ID: <5086956C.9010505@vu.nl>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>


On 23-10-2012 14:50, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>
>> What's the likely hood of this Formal Objection happening then? withdrawn or still active?

All,

We stressed this some time ago in the WG telecon: pls refrain from 
talking about "formal objection", unless we are at the *end* of the 
consensus process.  Michael had a valid concern which is being 
addressed.  That's all.

And let's please change the subject line.

Guus


>
> A FO that never has been raised can neither be active nor withdrawn, but it looks like we're starting to get somewhere. Richard seems to be on it, work-item wise?
>
> Cheers,
> 	   Michael
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel.: +353 91 495730
> http://mhausenblas.info/
>
> On 23 Oct 2012, at 12:38, Nathan wrote:
>
>> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>> You're prepared to categorically exclude certain technologies from the set of standards that constitutes Linked Data. I'm not.
>>> +1
>>
>> What's the likely hood of this Formal Objection happening then? withdrawn or still active?
>>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 13:03:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT