W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Potential Formal Object from DERI over JSON-LD

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:49:36 +0100
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <212D3EB4-6FAE-4CD8-9398-0CC6BEE04808@deri.org>
To: nathan@webr3.org

> What's the likely hood of this Formal Objection happening then? withdrawn or still active?

A FO that never has been raised can neither be active nor withdrawn, but it looks like we're starting to get somewhere. Richard seems to be on it, work-item wise?

Cheers,
	   Michael

--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel.: +353 91 495730
http://mhausenblas.info/

On 23 Oct 2012, at 12:38, Nathan wrote:

> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>> You're prepared to categorically exclude certain technologies from the set of standards that constitutes Linked Data. I'm not.
>> +1
> 
> What's the likely hood of this Formal Objection happening then? withdrawn or still active?
> 
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 12:50:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT